Skip to content
Print This Post

Fixed Versus Variable Rate Simulation: The Winner Is … Monday Morning Interest Rate Update (December 2, 2013)

by Dave Larock

Mortgage Rate ConceptIt’s time to revisit the question that everyone loves to ask: Is it better to go with a fixed- or variable-rate mortgage today?

While we all crave certainty, especially when making important financial decisions, there is no one-size-fits-all answer to this question.

For starters, there are important qualitative factors to consider when choosing one option over the other. For example, if you’re more likely to lose sleep at night worrying that your mortgage payments will increase, you should go with a fixed rate. If you’ll lose sleep worrying that you’re paying too much interest, a variable rate is probably the way to go. Simply put, you can’t put a price on peace of mind.

Once these individual factors are accounted for, just about every borrower I work with asks for my view of where rates may be headed over the next several years. While my crystal ball is as murky as ever, I am happy to explain how various factors influence the future direction of our mortgage rates, and to offer my take on what these tea leaves are currently telling us. (While adding the caveat that the only thing my opinion and $2.00 will guarantee them is a hot cup of coffee!)

In today’s post I’ll try to put a stake in the ground and create a base-case estimate of where mortgage rates may be headed over the next five years (while trying to err on the conservative side.) I’ll then use that estimate to run a variable-rate simulation that will allow you to compare the relative costs of a five-year fixed-rate versus a five-year variable-rate mortgage.

Base Case Variable-Rate Key Assumption #1 – When Will They Rise?

We live in interesting times.

Most of the factors that push mortgage rates higher are benign at the moment, and are likely to stay that way for the foreseeable future: Inflation is well below the Bank of Canada’s 2% target, our GDP growth is benign (notwithstanding the third-quarter uptick we saw last week), and there is little upward pressure on our labour costs.

While all of these factors suggest that our mortgage rates should remain at ultra-low levels for the foreseeable future, the experts I read who hold a lower-for-longer interest-rate view cite the continuation of the U.S. Federal Reserve’s ultra-loose monetary policy as the single most important driver.

Simply put, it is highly unlikely that the BoC will raise its overnight rate, on which our variable-rate mortgages are priced, before the U.S. Fed raises its equivalent short-term policy rate. (For a deeper explanation, please refer to my past posts.) And the Fed has repeatedly said that it won’t raise its policy rate until it has completely unwound its $85 billion/month in quantitative easing (QE) programs.

The Fed has waffled thus far on when it will start to unwind QE, in part because markets have reacted violently to any signs that tapering may soon begin. In previous commentaries, the Fed had forecast that it would completely unwind its QE programs and begin raising its policy rate in mid-2015. But more recently, the Fed has toyed with idea of keeping its policy rate at 0% for much longer.

In recent research papers, members of the Fed have argued that the Fed should extend its forward guidance and commit to keeping its policy rate at 0% until as late as 2018, as a way of offsetting negative momentum when it starts to taper its QE programs.

That softening in policy has caused many of the experts I read to extend their rate-increase forecasts, and to now speculate that mid-2015 would be the absolute earliest that the Fed would raise its policy rate. Nonetheless, we’ll stick to the mid-2015 time frame in our base-case simulation in an effort to be conservative about when rates may rise.

Base Case Variable-Rate Key Assumption #2 – How High Will They Go?

If the BoC starts increasing its overnight rate in mid-2015, how much will it increase by?

When the BoC decides to raise its overnight rate, it often hikes several times over consecutive meetings in what is called a ‘tightening cycle’. If we’re going to assume that the BoC will raise the overnight rate in mid-2015, we also need to make assumptions about how many times it will do so, and how quickly, once it starts tightening.

As luck would have it, last week the venerable Benjamin Tal, Deputy Chief Economist at CIBC, offered some compelling insight on this topic. Here is a summary of what he said:

  • Canadians will be surprised “by how little tightening it will take by the BoC to slow down our economy” because our record household debt levels make us increasingly sensitive to rate hikes.
  • Specifically, “a 100-basis point increase in the effective interest rate on household debt [today] is equivalent to a 120-basis point increase five years ago and a 140 basis point increase 10 years ago.”
  • “In fact, a tightening of monetary policy by the Bank of Canada is currently 25% more effective than an equivalent move by the Fed.” This means that the BoC may not even match the Fed’s eventual increases, as many have long assumed.
  • “The increased sensitivity to higher rates in Canada will limit the magnitude of any future rate hikes.”

I agree with Mr. Tal’s view that our rates should rise gradually and over time. But interest rates are influenced by many factors and not all of them are predictable. If we’re going to build a conservative forecast, let’s assume that the BoC never cuts its overnight rate over the next five years and assume  that the overnight rate increases a little faster than we might otherwise expect.

My base case has the BoC starting to raise the overnight rate by 0.25% in July and September of 2015, and agVariable-rate Simulation (December 1, 2013)ain in January and March of 2016. Then, because five years is a long time and we can’t possibly know what the future will hold, we’ll assume two more 0.25% increases in July and September of 2017, and two more in July and September of 2018 (see chart for a complete visual representation).

Below is a summary of how a $300,000 mortgage at a five-year fixed rate at 3.35% compares to the same loan amount borrowed at a five-year variable rate starting at 2.45% (prime minus 0.55%) using this forecast:
Fixed vs. Variable - Dec. 1, 2013

As usual when I run these simulations, I’d like to add one more wrinkle.

I regularly advise my variable-rate mortgage borrowers to bank the savings inherent in today’s variable-rate mortgage by setting their monthly payment as if they had actually taken today’s five-year fixed rate of 3.35% instead.

In this case, that would mean adding a discretionary payment of $138/month, to make the initial monthly variable-rate payment of $1,336 equal to the monthly fixed-rate payment of $1,474. (Once a variable-rate borrower sets up this extra payment, the lender can put a note on file so that it is taken automatically for as long as you leave the instruction in place, meaning that you don’t have to call every month to keep this arrangement going.)

I love this strategy because it gets you used to paying a higher rate (3.35% instead of 2.45%) and as such, if your variable rate rises, you simply adjust the $138 discretionary payment down so that your total monthly payment remains at $1,474 until your variable rate rises above 3.35%. In the meantime, you pay off your mortgage more quickly and increase the odds that you will have a lower mortgage balance at renewal, even if your rate rises abruptly in the latter part of your term.

Here is the comparison chart (below) with the results from this make-hay-while-the-sun-shines approach for variable-rate borrowers included:
Fixed vs. Variable #2 - Dec. 1, 2013

While making the discretionary variable-rate payment only saves a few hundred dollars in interest cost over the initial five-year period, these savings will continue to grow over the remaining life of the mortgage (note that the balance at renewal is several thousand dollars lower).

In summary, even if we assume what would appear to be an aggressive raising of rates by the BoC, there is still a modest savings for variable-rate borrowers. Some may quite rightly say that this small saving is not worth the risk inherent in the variable rate choice – but what if rates do not rise this fast and/or this consistently? In either of those cases, the savings would be much larger.

I hope that this post helps dispel the myth that a variable rate is a bad choice if rates rise. As demonstrated in the above simulation, a variable rate can still be the right choice even if rates rise – as long as they don’t increase too early or too often.

Five-year Government of Canada bond yields were two basis points lower last week, closing at 1.74% on Friday. Lenders continue to drop their rates in response to falling yields, and five-year fixed rates are now offered in the 3.35% range. Well-qualified borrowers who know where to look may even do a little better.

Five-year variable rates are available in the prime minus 0.55% range (which works out to 2.45% using today’s prime rate of 3.00%).   

The Bottom Line: If you can tell me what will happen to mortgage rates over the next five years, I can tell you with certainty whether a fixed or variable rate will save you money. If not, we can only make our best educated guess about what the future will bring. If our rates roughly follow the simulated path outlined above, today’s variable rate would prove the better option over the next five years … assuming that you can sleep at night.

 

David Larock is an independent full-time mortgage planner and industry insider. If you are purchasing, refinancing or renewing your mortgage, contact Dave or apply for a Mortgage Check-up to obtain the best available rates and terms.
Share
8 Comments
  1. BCoach.ca permalink

    Thank you… this reasonably-founded KISS advice helps makes sense of this challenge

  2. Magda permalink

    I enjoyed reading your article and agree with it for the most part, with one exception. When you sign for a variable rate mortgage for a certain term, the payment is set at that time and it will not change over the length of the term. It is a common misconception to think that the payment will be changing as soon as the rate changes. If prime rate goes up or down, the amount that goes towards interest will go up or down, respectively. The required payment will then be re-evaluated at the time of renewal keeping the leftover amortization in mind. At that point, the payment may be increased (or decreased) in order for the client to be done paying their mortgage within the prescribed amortization.
    So, according to your example, the mortgagee would have to increase their payment so that the principle part of the payment remained the same if prime went up.
    I do wholeheartedly agree about choosing the variable rate mortgage and then increasing your payment to that of a fixed-rate term instead. That is a great way to go!

  3. Jeremy permalink

    Dave, I’ve been reading your posts for several months now and have really enjoyed them. Your advice is both practical and easy to understand. The periodic comparisons between fixed and variable rate mortgages have been valuable, and supported me to stick with variable rate when I renewed several months ago. Keep up the great work!

  4. Hi Magda,

    Are you by chance confusing US and Canadian policies? In Canada the vast majority of lenders increase variable-rate payments when the prime rate rises.
    Best regards,
    Dave

  5. Thanks for the feedback Jeremy!

  6. Magda permalink

    Hi Dave,

    No, I am not confusing US and Canadian policies and am well-versed in Canadian rules. Here is a quote straight from a Canadian bank’s website:

    “With an RBC Royal Bank Variable Rate Mortgage, your payment amount stays fixed for the term; however, the interest rate will fluctuate with any changes in our prime interest rate.”

    I did think your article is excellent though and it did convince me further to renew into a variable rate mortgage, even in our current low-interest environment. A well-written piece. Thanks for that!

  7. Mike permalink

    Thanks for writing this article. I will be renewing my mortgage in January and I have received conflicting advice on whether to go with a fixed or variable rate mortgage. Have you considered writing an article on the pros/cons of going with a variable rate mortgage shorter than five years? There are some attractive rates in a three year variable right now. Would that not allow a home owner who is buying a new house or renewing right now to take advantage of the current low rates and then renew at a fixed rate before they start to climb exponentially?

  8. Jake permalink

    @Magda, perhaps RBC does this but this is yet another reason not to go with them for variable-rate. Why would anyone want to get into the habit of one payment while rates go up? I dont know of any other lenders that change the interest/principal breakdown – and I’d bet that the content on the website is misunderstood. I’d ask an RBC rep before making such claims.

    @Mike – You can fix a 3- or 5-year term anytime so I’m not sure why you’d consider a 3-year unless the 3-year rate was that much better. Yes a 3-year gives you a fully open option sooner so perhaps that’s another reason. I don’t see there to be a big difference between 3- and 5-year variable terms at this time.

Leave a Reply

Note: XHTML is allowed. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS


5 + seven =