Once again, “uncertainty” was the main theme pervading both the Bank’s policy statement and its accompanying Monetary Policy Report (MPR).
Somewhat surprisingly, the Bank, which has tended to consistently err on the optimistic side of its forecasts, offered a cautious assessment of our recent run of stronger than expected data. The consensus was ready for the Bank to sound a hawkish tone, but the current backdrop of ongoing trade wars and slowing economic momentum both in the U.S. and globally led to caution winning out.
In today’s post I’ll provide highlights from its latest communications to explain why.
When times are tough and it weakens, our exports become more competitively priced and the costs of our imports rise, increasing the appeal of domestic alternatives (where available). This naturally occurring process provides stimulus that has far fewer side affects than alternatives like deficit spending, rate cuts and/or unconventional monetary policies.
When times are good, the Loonie strengthens. Our exports become less competitively priced and the costs of our imports fall, shifting demand away from domestic sources and towards foreign alternatives. This helps to relieve inflationary pressures that typically build during extended periods of strong growth, with fewer negative side effects and a more nuanced impact than Bank of Canada (BoC) rate hikes.
Not every economy enjoys access to this useful tool.
To wit, the U.S. futures market is now pricing in 100% odds of a 0.25% rate cut when the Fed next meets on July 31, and it is pricing in 68% odds that the Fed will lower its policy rate by 0.75% (or more) by the end of this year.
Here are five highlights from the Fed’s latest update:
Recent U.S. economic data have shown slowing momentum in many key areas, such as employment growth, consumer spending, manufacturing output, export sales and home sales. Not surprisingly, the consensus now forecasts that U.S. GDP will slow sharply from 3.1% in the first quarter to around 1.8% in the second quarter on an annualized basis.
This loss of momentum comes after nine quarter-point interest rate increases by the U.S. Fed that began in December 2015. As with Bank of Canada (BoC) moves, the Fed’s rate hikes take time to assert their full impact. If we use the common assumption that this process takes an average of two years, consider that thus far, five of the Fed’s nine hikes have been on the books for less time than that.
The current U.S. economic expansion is about to become the longest in U.S. history, but the Fed’s aggressive monetary-policy tightening isn’t the only cause for concern.
This is a phenomenon that doesn’t occur very often. In normal markets, longer term interest rates are higher than shorter term rates. A yield-curve inversion happens when the yields offered on longer-term bonds drop below the yields offered on shorter-term bonds.
At first glance, this is counterintuitive. Why would I buy a bond that ties up my money for longer and also gives me a lower return?
Well … since you asked …
In its accompanying statement, the Bank offered its latest take on the incoming data with specific emphasis on “developments in household spending, oil markets, and the global trade environment”.
In today’s post I’ll break down the BoC’s observations and offer my take on how these three key areas are evolving.
First, some background.
The Bank of Canada (BoC) recently reminded us that its primary mandate is to keep inflation “low, stable and predictable”, even if doing so “may create side effects that make the economy vulnerable to new shocks.”
Given that, anyone keeping an eye on mortgage rates should be paying closing attention to the inflation data, the latest of which were released by Statistics Canada last week.
Here are five highlights:
Last week Bank of Canada (BoC) Governor Poloz called for more innovation in the Canadian mortgage market. He specifically targeted three key areas where innovation is needed, with longer-term mortgages topping his list.
In today’s post I’ll outline why longer-term mortgages have historically had limited appeal for both borrowers and lenders in Canada, and I’ll offer a suggestion to Governor Poloz on how he can facilitate a dramatic increase in the uptake of already available ten-year fixed-rate terms.
First, a confession.
While this didn’t come as a surprise to the Bank of Canada (BoC) or to mainstream economists, the contraction is nonetheless concerning because it marks the fourth time in the last six months that our GDP has shrunk. It also puts to rest any hope that the 0.3% month-over-month GDP growth we saw in January was a signal that our stalled economic momentum would recover more quickly than expected.
In its latest Monetary Policy Report (which I summarized here), the BoC predicted that our economy would return to its previous growth trajectory in the second half of 2019. The Bank lowered its estimate of our annual real GDP growth in 2019 from 1.7% to 1.2%, but it also held firm to its belief that our economy would return to “slightly above potential” after that and maintained its GDP growth forecasts of 2.1% in 2020 and 2.0% in 2021.
If the BoC’s most recent forecast is correct, we should expect that it will begin to consider additional rate hikes in early 2020. That would mean that variable mortgage rates wouldn’t rise until then but our fixed mortgage rates, which are priced of Government of Canada bond yields, would be expected to rise sooner in anticipation of the BoC’s move because longer-term bond yields are more sensitive to changes in our economic outlook.
Of course, that scenario is far from certain.
The Bank’s typical Monetary Policy Report (MPR) acknowledges that current conditions are weaker than expected but then makes the case that they are soon to improve. Wash, rinse, repeat.
The BoC’s hope for better days is not without some foundation. For example, low levels of unemployment can trigger a virtuous, self-reinforcing cycle where robust wage growth leads to increased consumer spending, which then spurs a rise in business investment that stimulates more job creation, etc.
Only things haven’t worked out that way.
Ultra-low unemployment hasn’t fuelled the kind of broad-based wage growth that our policy makers expected to see. We have had increased consumer spending, but it’s been fuelled by rising debt rather than rising incomes – and debt is really just future consumption brought forward. Business investment hasn’t materialized as hoped, and there is little evidence of any self-reinforcing cycle.
The Bank of Canada (BoC) is not expected to move its policy rate when it meets this Wednesday. The real question in the lead up to this meeting is whether the Bank will continue its shift to a more dovish outlook.
Against a steadily weakening economic backdrop, thus far the BoC has conceded only that its next rate hike will likely be delayed by what it views as a temporary “soft patch”. But if the Bank is now more concerned about slowing momentum, its accompanying Monetary Policy Report (MPR), which offers valuable insights into the BoC’s evolving economic view, should make that clear.
There is an especially interesting subtext this time around.
It stood at 1.82% on February 28 before plummeting to 1.40% on March 27. Lenders were initially slow to lower their five-year fixed rates, but they eventually dropped them from a range of 3.29% to 3.54% in late February to a range of 2.94% to 3.14% by late March.
Since that time, the five-year GoC bond yield has ricocheted back up, and by last Friday it closed all the way back at 1.64%. If the chart on the right were a roller coaster ride, it would come with a motion sickness warning.
In his speech in Iqaluit, Nunavut, Governor Poloz reiterated his view that our current slowdown will prove temporary. While current Government of Canada (GoC) bond-yield levels indicate that bond-market investors are more pessimistic, when the person with his hand on our policy-rate lever offers his views, we are wise to pay heed.
Here are the highlights from Governor Poloz’s most recent speech:
Their decline has been underpinned by softening domestic economic data, which have pushed down Government of Canada (GoC) bond yields, on which our fixed mortgage rates are priced. Our weakening economic backdrop has also made the Bank of Canada (BoC) more dovish about its plans to hike its overnight rate, on which our variable mortgage rates are priced.
While our own slowing economic momentum has been the primary driver of our falling bond yields and mortgage rates, changes in the U.S. Federal Reserve’s outlook are also contributing to their recent drop. That’s because we sell about 80% of our exports into U.S. markets, and on a comparative basis, our provinces trade more with their U.S. neighbours to the south than they do with each other.
Here is a summary of the recent U.S. developments that are helping to put downward pressure on our bond yields, and by association, our mortgage rates:
Last Thursday, our federal government released its 2019 budget, and it included several initiatives that were designed to improve housing affordability.
While on first pass this will be welcome news for home buyers and for many of our now somewhat beleaguered regional housing markets, the federal government has thus far left out many key details that are needed to assess the full impact of its main new initiative, the First Time Home Buyers Incentive (FTHBI) program.
Bluntly put, the announcement reminded me of a term paper that was written during an all-nighter the day before it was due (and my university roommates will confirm that I am somewhat of an expert on that topic).
In today’s post, I’ll outline what we know about the two most prominent initiatives that were announced last week, I’ll offer my take on how these changes are likely to impact our regional housing markets, and I’ll explain why these changes should concern existing home owners across the country.